vendredi 26 juin 2009

the king of pop is dead



(from Variety)
Jackson fans gather to mourn
Hollywood Boulevard, UCLA sites of vigils
By JUSTIN KROLL, ANDREW STEWART

Thursday afternoon and evening, Michael Jackson's fans gathered together to mourn his death and celebrate his life in Hollywood, Westwood and various other spots around town.

But worldwide, the Internet and Twitter became the collective grieving ground for millions who wanted to find news about Jackson or express their feelings. Spikes in traffic were huge, slowing down servers, according to numerous press reports.

Motorists in L.A. could hear various Jackson songs on other drivers' car radios, since plenty of stations devoted all their Thursday air time to the performer.

In Westwood, dozens of people -- including many UCLA students -- gathered outside of the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center upon hearing the news that Jackson had been taken there.

Some in the crowd were members of the news media, who had to shout over the noise of the half-dozen helicopters flying above the hospital.

Some supporters brought flowers, looking for a place to lay them, while many others brought out cameras and phones to record the event. While members of the press waited to be let inside, a group wired a laptop with speakers and sang along with Jackson's "Billie Jean."

Family members and friends of Jackson's also arrived at the hospital, including Elizabeth Taylor and the star's brother, Jermaine Jackson.

Shortly after 6 p.m., Jermaine Jackson held a brief press conference. He said the cause of death had yet to be determined. Then he asked everyone to give the family room to grieve.

In Hollywood, fans' sentiments may have been sincere, even if their sense of location was a bit askew.

Jackson's star is across the Chinese Theater but was off-limits Thursday afternoon and evening because of Universal's "Bruno" premiere. As guests exited the premiere, fans of Jackson had already begun to gather around his star.

The film premiere was also affected by the day's events. In the pic, Sacha Baron Cohen (in character as Bruno) appears with Jackson's sister La Toya, but the scene was cut from tonight's screening. Also, at the film's after-party, the DJ played a heavy rotation of Jackson classics.

The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce directed mourners to the Jacksons' family star on Vine Street. But a few folks came up with an alternative and left flowers on the star of radio host Michael Jackson, the Brit who is considered the father of talkradio in Los Angeles.

The Chamber of Commerce said the Hollywood Historic Trust will place flowers on Jackson's star Friday morning.

(Dave McNary contributed to this report.)

mardi 23 juin 2009

Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN | on hbo

Just re-watched it on a whim after ONCE and have to say, wow; this movie is good. Hot sex aside (and there's a bit of that, clearly), the style of the thing is great. It's a story about boys becoming men, about "brothers from another mother," and the way Diego and Gael--aww, jeez, can I call them that? after seeing them in person once? I don't think so--the way Luna and Garcia Bernal interact, sexually and otherwise, impresses me every time. And Cuaron knows how to work a voice over.

I don't know if people like how much certain modern Mexican movies--I guess I mean Cuaron films--use voice over. I often don't prefer it in American films, but I can always stand it in a Cuaron film. Why is that? It's done better, that's why. I'm watching JUMPER right now, and the voice over is so heavy-handed ("I wanted to tell her so much...but I couldn't...so I left."), it doesn't add to the story. And in my opinion, if it's not adding, it's subtracting. If you're not part of the solution...

More on JUMPER later.

Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN (2001)
plot: A lady's last sex wish.
thought: Wouldn't you choose Gael, too?
in five: 4/5
sexually speaking: IMDB page

ONCE | on hbo

Missed this one two years ago, and have wanted to see it since. Many compared AUGUST RUSH to ONCE--they both feature a love story, a male musician, and some great city locations--but the similarities kind of stop there. ONCE is...a remarkable achievement. And I don't mean to discredit RUSH, but ONCE doesn't just hit the ball; it knocks it out of the park.

Did I just make a baseball metaphor?

Like Juan-Pierre of the LA Dodgers, ONCE goes into beast mode!

Yes, I did.*

But ONCE is, uh, better than baseball. ONCE is like...an ice cube melting. It starts out all packed together--boy sings a song, boy meets girl--and you think you know where it's going to go, but then it settles into its warmth and puddles out into something refreshingly original (did that metaphor work?), both happy and sad. It's romantic without being sentimental; it's quirky without being too clever; it's sweet without being too artificial; it's real without being dark. It's indy, but it feels new. It made me cry. And it stars that guy from The Frames!

In America, musicians who star as musicians in movies are kind of jokes. Britney Spears in CROSSROADS; Mariah Carey in GLITTER. And when a part calls for a musician, they often use an actor: Joaquin Phoenix in WALK THE LINE; Jonathan Rhys Meyers in AUGUST RUSH. Sure, there's a Jamie Foxx in RAY to make waves, but in general, musician in real life does not equal believable musician in film. Enter Glen Hansard who plays our starring "Guy" to Marketa Irglova's "Girl" in ONCE. Without them both, this film would not have been the fairytale it was. Sure, their accents were a little hard for me to follow at first (thick Irish has never been an easy one for me), but the brogue was worth deciphering, most definitely.

The tale between them unfolds sweetly, warming around the edges, melting even cynical me and showing that, as you might expect, (spoiler alert) the best love stories are the ones that happen once.

ONCE (2006)
plot: Music is the food of love.
thought: Bittersweet yet good to eat.
in five: 4.5/5
fall in slowly: http://www.foxsearchlight.com/once/

*=I actually hate sports. Everything but football-football (i.e., soccer) and American college football--and there still everything but my alma mater's football--and ice skating. Oh, and competitive cheer. And I can stand Olympics swimming and gymnastics. But otherwise, through and through, me no likey the back and forth competition. It's not a truth I tend to confess, but there you go; I'm a team sports-hater.

jeudi 11 juin 2009

OBSERVE AND REPORT

For starters...wow. How am I ever going to catch up? I feel like I saw this movie back in January.

It was good, funny, dark...ugh, I can't do this for every movie, can I? Pretend I just saw it? I don't know....

OKAY.

The thing about OBSERVE AND REPORT is that it came out about two months after PAUL "I will blart on you" MALL COP, so the comparison was inevitable. But they are definitely distinctly different movies. PAUL BLART is for the kids. OBSERVE is for the angsty post teens who still hit up their parents for laundry on the weekends and have yet to get past community college. It is in another realm altogether, and though it might be correct to simplify the thing and call it "another mall cop movie," it wouldn't really be fair. It's not even "another Seth Rogen movie." It's...it's its own thing.

Despite the fact that I'm flying high with my university degree (ok ok, flying mid-level...mid-level to low...), I still enjoyed the movie. It went into territory I didn't expect--look out for a scene where Rogen and his mall cop friend smack up some skateboarders in the parking lot--and then start doing heroin--but it maintained a pretty clear "eff you" kind of voice throughout, as if the writer, Jody Hill (not Jonah Hill), was like, "Let's just push this a little further and see what the studio says." Well, they apparently said yes, and for the right reasons. Half-assing your dirty little deed just gives you blue balls. Go full force and blow your load, I say. Not everyone will like it--but not everyone was supposed to. So eff them.

the plot: Mall cop tries to excel.
the thought: Turns to drugs and rape?
in five: 3/5

protect and serve: http://observe-and-report.warnerbros.com/

two months worth of fire city rentals

Here comes the rainstorm.

Back in March, Turner Classic Movies was running a special on--get this--classic movies. This time, the special was focused: it was for the few, the proud, the Oscar-nominated. I missed most of the specials, but I managed to catch the last fourth of THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY, as well as the entire cut of THE AFRICAN QUEEN, starring Humphrey Bogart in a less-than-luxurious role and Katharine Hepburn at perhaps her most prude and uppity. She's a British missionary, he's a Canadian alcoholic, it's the middle of World War II and they team up to rush the African bush and sink the Louisa, a German vessel. Bogart won the Academy Award--and a handle of rum.

THE AFRICAN QUEEN (1951)
plot: Missionary on a wild streak.
thought: Mid-century sexual innuendos abound!
in five: 3/5
sail away

Next up, decided to catch a Christmas movie that had mildly interested me the first time it came around. I missed it, because it was in theatres for all of two minutes, which should have tipped me off. Though it co-stars Sarah Jessica Parker and Luke Wilson, neither of these facts really recommend it to me. But I don't blame the movie (completely). It's a holiday film AND a romantic comedy! They're just not my genres.

THE FAMILY STONE
(2005)
plot: Lame girlfriend visits the family.
thought: I prefer holidays chez moi.
in five: 1.5/5
family time

Next, grabbed some friends together to see an original sci-fi thriller. Now, I thought I had already seen ALIEN. And parts of it looked familiar, but I think I might have been confusing it with the sequels. Just not sure, really. Luckily, I saw it now--and it was awesome.

ALIEN (1979)
plot: Watch out, alien on board.
thought: It will suck you up.
in five: 4.5/5
abandon ship!

I consider myself a fan of the Coen Bros., even though I haven't seen all their films. Still haven't seen FARGO. And I know--that's bad--but I'm going to see it eventually; I will. Until then, I'll content myself with Billy Bob Thornton and his black-and-white fight against the fetters of society. If the score doesn't get you, the subtle story twists will.

THE MAN WHO WASN'T THERE (2001)
plot: Disenchanted barber makes unfortunate choices.
thought: Were 1940s actually like this?
in five: 3.5/5
read it and watch it

A departure from the serious--I think I've found my new favorite guilty pleasure. Not only does Chris Rock play the part of about five different supporting characters, but Wanda Sykes steals the show as the title character's girlfriend, Biggie Shorty. The film is unabashedly ridiculous and invents its own language (Sepatown!). I'm not under any pretenses that POOTIE TANG is going to be memorable to anyone outside of a small circle of my friends, but frankly, I don't care.

POOTIE TANG (2001)
plot: Sa da tay! Kapa-chow!
thought: Watch this, ya greezy basterd.
in five: 4/5
quote it, too

Huge Tina Fey fan--and I wouldn't kick Amy Poehler out the house for tracking in dirt--so was excited to see them costar in the upcoming comedy. It wasn't as hilarious as I'd have liked, but both of them are comedy idols in my opinion, so whatever, they ruled it well enough. I think the reason why it wasn't as well received as, say, Fey's impressions of Sarah Palin, is because it was a softer comedy. It was an unconventional romantic comedy, but it was still a romantic comedy. Oh wait, doesn't that mean I should have hated it? Well...I didn't HATE-hate it....

BABY MAMA (2008)
plot: Single lady's baby clock goes tick-tock.
thought: Adoption is always an option.
in five: 3/5
bring baby home

Back to the dark side for a Sundance so-called favorite that I was hearing mixed things about. Well, I liked BLINDNESS. Based on the 1995 Portuguese novel by Jose Saramago, the film is dark and explored something people don't like to consider--that is, it looked at what animals we all can be when put in animalistic circumstances. Left with the lawless, forgotten, frightened and confused? My advice is this: lock your doors, watch your crotch, and hide your food.

BLINDNESS (2008)
plot: All society suddenly goes blind.
thought: ...then caca hits the fan.
in five: 3.5/5
watch and go blind!

Love Michel Gondry, so it was only natural that I'd want to catch his latest and greatest. I know the jury was split on THE SCIENCE OF SLEEP (which personally, I enjoyed immensely the first time and a little less the second), but such is the fantastic, artistic nature of Gondry's films. It's not about "good" or "bad"--they're art. All art is art, tout court. And dammit if the term "sweded" isn't clever.

BE KIND REWIND (2008)
plot: DVD kills the video store.
thought: Then comes Netflix, On-demand & Blu-Ray!
in five: 4/5
get sweded

After hearing all the noise about Prop 8, I've striven to educate myself more about gay rights. I took this quiz online (through Project Implicit) that said I was "somewhat accepting" about gay people, and I was kind of ashamed. I voted no on Prop 8 like any smart person with a heart would, but I'm not content feeling anything less than completely accepting about everyone who walks life a little differently than I do. "Tolerant" isn't the right word--tolerant means you bite your tongue. Accepting means you open your arms.

Maybe it's dumb, but that's part of why I watched PUCCINI FOR BEGINNERS. That isn't to say I watched the film and went, "Oh wow, now I know what it is to be a lesbian. Check that box--I accept." No. Duh. But five years ago, I would have read about a movie about a lesbian romance and thought something like, "What a funny story; that doesn't really exist, does it?" So like Lindsay Lohan's character in MEAN GIRLS, I'm sucking the minimal amounts of poison out, one gay-themed movie at a time, I guess.

PUCCINNI FOR BEGINNERS
(2006)
plot: Pretentious lesbian reconfirms her lesbianism.
thought: "Puccini" in the title = yawn.
in five: 2.5/5
listen in

So I didn't like the movie much, but let's face it--it was a bit of a romantic comedy. It also had that high-brow "I'm from the upper [insert direction] side" New Yorker humor that tends to attract an eye roll from me. So haha, wasn't the best.

There were more rentals from the last few months--but I'll cover those in a future post. Aaaaah, this took forever to write. I've lost my touch. But it's official. I'm back.

lundi 1 juin 2009

Back, in the red

Wow, the last time I posted was...23 march 2009. It is now June 1st.

Where have I been?!

Well, for starters, I haven't been doing nothing. Life has gotten busy, and I have been busy absorbing it, falling behind here to get ahead elsewhere. But I'm starting to realise--or rather, remember--that my life is not mutually exclusive of my writing. They're joined, you see; I'm a writer. Without writing (dare I wax so poetic?), there is no life. I'm like Ursula in THE LITTLE MERMAID, whose job, she claims, is to help unfortunate merfolk. "That's what I do," she tells Ariel. "It's what I live for."

Yeah, I know she was lying. But the words fit my story, so I'm using them.

There's also the trouble that, without documenting what I watch, what I eat--what I live, in fact--quite simply, I forget it all. And despite my somewhat consuming need to nestle myself within the fickle yet passionate grip of Culture, my memory for her shape and form has long been slight and fleeting. Basically, I don't remember which movies I've seen or what I thought about them after a while. I'm convinced my hippocampus is shot from years of sleep deprivation in high school and college; I have sleep debt you wouldn't believe. It's why I watch shows like "The Soup" on E!, to remind me what's what. It's like culture homework.

So I'm just checking in now to say that I'm not gone, I was just absent for a long minute, but I'm back. And I know what's what. I've got a lot of catch-up to do before I'm back in the black, but over the coming weeks (days? months?), we'll get it all down, if it's meant to be. I've been keeping a list.

MORE THAN FIVE THINGS THAT LETOP5 PLANS TO DOCUMENT:
african queen, the family stone, LA cafe round-up (cafe bolivar, funnel mill, panini garden, insomnia cafe, dialog cafe, literati, clementine, cafe muse, 18th st coffee), observe & report, alien, the man who wasn't there, COLCOA festival (the first day of the rest of your life, la fille de monaco, louise-michel, je l'aimais, la cliente), pootie tang, the soloist, kogi at the alibi room, cecconi's, baby mama, rudo y cursi, blindness, star trek, x-men origins: wolverine, be kind rewind, SF movies (brothers bloom, devil's advocate, to wong foo thx for everything, steel magnolias, divine secrets of the ya-ya sisterhood), SF food (dosa, house of chicken and waffles, little star pizza, bar jules, mission pie, out the door, home-made guacamole), puccini for beginners, terminator salvation

There you go. And here I go.

lundi 23 mars 2009

I (still) LOVE YOU, MAN

Saw it again yesterday, because frankly, I wanted to pay for it. Well, actually, I had wanted to sneak in to see it, but it was playing on a different floor than DUPLICITY, so lack of mobility forced my friends and I to act honestly. To convince myself the spending was worth it, I did then sort of operate with the delusional idea that my meager ticket sale--much like my one vote in the primaries--would help boost the film, and you know what? Democracy is not dead. I LOVE YOU, MAN finished second, and that ain't too bad. A mere $6 million behind Nicolas Cage. Wait, what is "mere" about $6 million?

Okay, well it was a crowded weekend, so you have to forgive the film that. But having seen it again, I will say that my initial impressions still ring true. It is a funny, funny movie, for all its sweet awkwardness and overflow of bromanticisim. Also, having had a friend who worked on it, I enjoyed catching her name in the credits!

If you were wondering, then, wonder no more: I LOVE YOU, MAN is "laugh-out loud funny!" and gets "two thumbs up!" and will have you saying "Paul Rudd is hilarious!" So go see it.

(And yes, if I were an actual movie critic, I would talk in movie quotes alllll the time.)

Get thee to the cinema, bro: MovieTickets.com

DUPLICITY

This just in: Clive and Julia didn't win the weekend. But having enjoyed seeing it at a moderately packed 10am showing at the local AMC, I'm kind of surprised they didn't fare better. The numbers don't lie, though. And the numbers, so says Hollywood Reporter, are thus:

KNOWING (starring Nic Cage): $24.8 million
I LOVE YOU, MAN (starring Paul Rudd): $18 million
DUPLICITY (starring Clive & Julia): $14.4 million

What do we know about KNOWING? It's got Nicolas Cage, and he rules the box office. Know what we love about I LOVE YOU, MAN? Paul Rudd's fabulous awkwardness revealed. And know what's duplicitous about DUPLICITY? The fact that these spies are incredibly smart and yet, ultimately, easily duped. Is that what turned people off? Or was it the lack of novelty? If I had to guess, I would say the MR. AND MRS. SMITH-ishness of this film, the "it's kind of already been done before" factor, might be what chiefly worked against it. Plus, it's been a while since the world has seen Julia, and Clive has never really been a sure BO-winner, despite his sultry eyes. What I know is that DUPLICITY, despite these things working against it, actually is enjoyable.

Focusing on two lovers who are married to their careers as corporate counterintelligence spies, DUPLICITY weaves a thick but comprehensible net that basically teaches the moral "keep sex and work separate." When Clive and Julia (Ray and Claire, respectively) decide to take down their bosses and garner a huge pay-off in the process, we get roped into their journey of lies and subterfuge. Who can you trust? The answer is no one, no one at all. Another good title for this film, actually, might have been DOUBT.

One thing for which I must commend Tony Gilroy, the writer/director, is how thickly he wove his web. I actually wasn't sure a lot of the time who was conning who, which player was ahead or behind, but if you hang in, you figure it all out. Gilroy doesn't leave you hanging, and that I really liked. Unlike many other heist movies I've seen--and I've seen a good number--you knew exactly what the stakes were, exactly what each side was after, and the measure of believability within this world (how they were accomplishing their hijinks under either corporation's noses) was actually rather high. What scored low was the climax scene--and I don't want to give anything away, but I will say this: for two people presented as amazingly cunning spies, they shouldn't have let what happened happen.

Now, having seen both DUPLICITY and I LOVE YOU, MAN, I refuse to believe that KNOWING actually was the best of the three films. I won't be seeing it to confirm--sorry, Nic--but my gut tells me I'm right. If you want a pretty solid caper movie with some nice bits of romance thrown in, DUPLICITY will do ya fine. If you want NATIONAL TREASURE meets NEXT, well...you obviously already saw KNOWING.

plot: New-school espionage with old-school romance.
thought: They take shaving cream seriously.
in five: 3/5

no angelina: http://www.duplicitymovie.net/

dimanche 22 mars 2009

Laffer Saturday (Hamlet 2 & Grosse Pointe Blank)

Saw two comedies chez moi this weekend, both of which I loved.

HAMLET 2, starring Steve Coogan as a nutty high school theatre teacher struggling to produce an off-color play that will let him deal with his daddy issues. It is awkward city, but it is funny. Co-stars Marisa Tomei, Amy Poehler and Elisabeth Shue.

plot: Producing art is never easy.
thought: Woo, there are rape jokes.
in five: 3.5/5
play on: http://www.filminfocus.com/focusfeatures/film/hamlet_2

GROSSE POINTE BLANK, starring John Cusack in probably one of the best turns in his career, as an insecure hit man who travels home for his high school reunion. Co-stars Minnie Driver, Dan Aykroyd and Jeremy Piven.

plot: Hitman remembers his first love.
thought: Best dialogue of 1997.*
in five: 4/5
on imdb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119229/
read the first draft here.

*=FARGO actually won the award that year. GPB wasn't even nominated, which is sadness.

SUNSHINE CLEANING

Otherwise known as LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE: REDUX.*

A cute, little tale about a single mom and her troubled sister who both, along with their aging and addled father, try to keep life in check. Our key players are Rose (Amy Adams), Norah (Emily Blunt) and Joe (Alan Arkin). Together they raise Rose's son, Oscar (the adorable and ridiculously busy Jason Spevack), because, you know, it takes a village.

The three are still living in the aftershock of Joe's wife committing suicide some twenty years earlier, and their lives are in a permanent funk. Still living in their hometown, Rose works as a maid, Norah works to keep a job--any job--and Joe dreams up hair-brained, get-rich-quick schemes that all inadvertently fail. They're as American as the cast of lovable losers in LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, and that's this movie's strength. It's almost the same film. Hello, the word "sunshine" is in the title.

I never wrote about LITTLE MISS when I saw it in Paris, but I really liked that film; it was simple and just as special as everyone let on. I don't know what others say they loved about it, but me, it wasn't so much the story. It was the American-ness, that thick and heady middle class soot that oozed out of every scene. From the moment Toni Collette drops the bucket of KFC chicken on the table about three minutes in and announces that dinner is "ready," the American Studies major in me went berserk. I was in it. And even though Paul Dano's character got more normal and the plot a little less remarkable as the film went on, I had to appreciate how this film completely encompassed everything about America that you could love, hate or disinterestedly observe in such an accurate way.

Now, SUNSHINE CLEANING, though a reprisal of the theme, lacked that ooze. It was American, small-town American, but there was a little bit of melodrama and more than a little bit of unfinished character development. Our actors were great, though. Alan Arkin does a great Alan Arkin. And Emily Blunt a great dispassionate American girl in her mid-20s. And this is the first film in which I've really loved Amy Adams. Like--don't get me wrong--I like Amy Adams a lot. I like the idea of her. But having only seen MISS PETTIGREW and DOUBT, I know I haven't seen her best work. SUNSHINE CLEANING must definitely rank up there. She was the star of this film for me, and I'm so glad she was cast as Rose; she really owned it. Though I'll tell you what--for a single mother, Rose looked maaaaybe a bit too good. Better than all her high school friends, that's for sure. Times might be hard for her, but time has been harder on their hips. Then again, those women can shove it.

plot: Cleaning up houses and lives.
thought: Working at two hard jobs.
in five: 3.5/5

a little sunshine: http://www.sunshinecleaning-themovie.com/

*=This is post #200. Huzzah!

WATCHMEN (as watched from the outside)

The coming of WATCHMEN was heralded like the coming of the Nintendo Wii. Spreading like a splash of 300-style blood across the interwebs, its trailer was one of the most watched clips on YouTube last year. The week before its opening, Fandango allegedly crashed multiple times as fanboys and girls alike flooded the site to buy tickets to midnight screenings nationwide. But naysayers parlayed their critique, speaking more judgmentally about the film's flaws than Tom Colicchio dissing Stefan on the penultimate episode of this season's "Top Chef." The decries led those unfamiliar with the subject matter to lose interest in its reported SIN CITY-style darkness. All that hullabaloo, and now, a mere two weeks after it hit theatres, its presence is fading into a mere box office memory.

It's a shame, I must say, having just seen it. Why is it fading out when the film is so freakin' good?

Now, I'll admit, I don't read graphic novels (in fact, I barely read anything but my own blog, that's what a ham I am), so I knew nothing about WATCHMEN. I didn't know the characters, the plot, the fact that that blue guy is naked and swinging for most of the movie--didn't really know any of that until about a week ago. But I loved it. I think I even liked it more than some of my friends who are fans of the story's original form. Not sure if that means there's something wrong in the film's marketing...or something right in my digestion of it...or vice versa...or both, but I'm here to say that if you go in, hang-up free and at least a little informed, you're sure to enjoy WATCHMEN. Here's why I did:

1. The superheroes. I love superheros, and WATCHMEN has them in spades, behaving goodly, behaving badly, being human and being superhuman. I haven't seen so many men and women of mystery on screen since the X-MEN trilogy, and this was done so much better than Ratner could have, even if given a handicap (look, more special effects!). Their stories were well-realised, and I was completely drawn in by watching them use their powers, both practiced and inherent. This is a movie that extols superheros even as said icons critique themselves. It's kinda meta that way.

2. The central hero. Would you say it's Dr. Manhattan or Rorschach? I'd say the latter. I was most confused/intrigued by the character Rorschach, as I wasn't sure, really, what his power was--perhaps as a result of not having read the novel. But if you break it down and define what makes someone a superhero as someone who uses any superhuman ability to fight for good--be it superhuman intelligence (Tony Stark) or superhuman stickiness (Spiderman)--Rorschach fits the mold. They all did. About Rorschach, I thought, "Hmm. He is strong. And smart. Unbelievably violent. Yet fighting for good. And that mask thing is cool. He's a superhero." I was pleased by the non-traditional superhero "space" his character inhabited, and hence got pulled into his slightly psycho obsession with journals and justice. And really, in a fight, would you rather have him for or against you? He was a loner, he was a fighter, and he was the glue that brought these superheroes back together.

3. The tone. Again, one point for the non-traditional. If the coming era of superhero movies means a little more DARK KNIGHT, a little less IRON MAN, I'm not sad or happy--they're both great flicks--but I am impressed. I think it's got to be alienating to be "the only one of your kind" (thanks, HANCOCK), and exploring that alienation is human. Exploring it on Mars is just plain cool. It's also a bit wimpy of Dr. Blue Balls, but I forgive him. It ain't easy being all-powerful and somewhat god-like. I appreciated the darkness, the poignancy, of this tale of good-doers with some serious skeletons in their closets. Growing up different wasn't easy for Rorschach or Silk Spectre II, living in the present is a struggle for The Comedian and Nite Owl, in their own ways, and thinking about the future almost derails Dr. Manhattan. In this film, we see the underside of superhero life, and it ain't pretty. But like we saw in DARK KNIGHT last year, a superhero knows his/her place--serve the world first and self second; live a life of hurt either way. That dedication to depicting this message sets WATCHMEN apart, as it did the caped crusader.

4. Story accuracy. As I said--and please don't judge too harshly--I didn't read the graphic novels. I actually (sorry) didn't even know who the Watchmen were until about the fourth time I ran into the trailer, around mid-December of 2008. Yes, I know, way late. But I don't think that entirely dispels my ability to discuss the accuracy of the story. I've asked around, and people tell me the film was very true to the comic, even encapsulating much of the comic's flaws. Interestingly, the things I left thinking didn't work in the movie were things that, upon conversations with others, I found didn't work in the graphic novel, either. And certain observations I made--why is Rorschach so long-winded when dictating his journal but so terse when speaking in scene?--seemed to be details lifted straight from Alan Moore's pages. Don't take the credit if you don't want to, Mr. Moore, but it's all there. You wrote something brilliant, and Zack Snyder did his damnedest to get it all on screen. But how do you turn a painting into a poem? Changing mediums is tough, and I suppose that's why they invented DVD-extras. Apparently, upon DVD-release the already dauntingly lengthy film will be beefed with deleted scenes galore to make this re-telling of the reawakening of the world hopefully even closer to what Moore would have wanted. That's dedication to a story, my friends, and Snyder deserves some serious praise.

5. I was prepped [SPOILER ALERTS AHEAD]. Final reason I could enjoy WATCHMEN, I think, was because I was told I wouldn't. From every media source, friends and foes alike, everyone had an opinion about the movie. I wanted to go in a little "clean-slate," but it was impossible. I heard early that there was graphic violence, graphic sex, it was longer than TITANIC and darker than DARK KNIGHT. I heard Malin Ackerman sucked, you could see Billy Crudup's possibly fake balls, that it was confusing to the outsider (me) and slow in pacing to everyone. I went in informed, and I knew: "Get a good night's sleep the night before. Use the bathroom before it starts. Pay the frack attention. Don't be distracted by the cyan-colored schlong. Get ready for lots of dialogue and a fair bit of cartoonish blood." It was like cheating, knowing all this. But then by the time that [seriously, SPOILER ALERT] Matthew Goode's awful American accent revealed the Noah-and-the-Ark-like nature of this long-winded tale, I was hanging on every minute. I had been waiting for it to get bad, but it didn't. THE WATCHMEN delivered. Well, actually, the ending, the big climax/resolution kind of disappointed me, but knowing that's how the graphic novel ended as well means I had to forgive it. So what, if it boiled down to "kill a million, save a billion"? Was the ride worth it? Knowing what I knew walking in--certainly.

[END SPOILER ALERT]

Of course the cinematic portrayal of the most well-known graphic novel of all time stands to be critiqued, but as far as I can tell, the naysayers are shooting crap. I encourage anyone willing to spend three hours of their time in a dark room with the darkest heroes of our time to go in with an open mind. You don't have to be some graphic novel aficionado to love WATCHMEN. You just need to have a good appreciation for the superhero genre and, perhaps, dark characters in general. If you understand at least a bit of what you're getting into, you'll fare fine. You may enjoy it even more than expected. I, for one, totally did.

plot: Even superheroes drop like flies.
thought: Who will save us now?
in five: 4/5

watch them: http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/

LITERATI | lunch

Girlfriend, don't get me started on cafes. I love cafes. Give me a latte, anything from the bakery and some soft but lively music churned into the low hum of regulars mewling over humdrum life events, and you will be giving me a shot of happiness. Cafe culture is my forte; I live for cafes. And though Fire City is not a purveyor to the sauntering lifestyle (to which cafes typically cater), it does try hard to pretend. Isn't that what this city is about? Pretending? And thus, it has a high number of cafes stationed county-wide, albeit far apart.

LITERATI CAFE in Yupwood is a new discovery of mine. After it had been recommended to me by a number of friends, I looked it up and realised it was down the street from my place of business. I fancied a stop-in. I've been there twice now, and each time was wonderful. LITERATI is not flawless, however. But would I recommend and revisit? Most definitely.

Having recently undergone a makeover, Literati now inhabits two side-by-side locations. Side A is casual but always crowded, with Ikea-like wooden tables crammed too close together. But there is wi-fi, and the service is quick. Side B is a bit more upscale, more "this-is-strictly-business" lunch. The food items seem a touch more refined, and they are also pricier. I have only eaten on Side A and only during lunchtime. First visit, I had a grilled portabello mushroom panini with melted swiss on focaccia (amazing); second visit, I had carrot ginger soup with a side of Mediterranean salad replete with olives and pine nuts and a splash of house vinaigrette. Are you salivating yet? It's okay. I did, too.

I have yet to try the desserts or the classier end of the half-cafe-half-restaurant, but if the first two tastes are anything to go by, I doubt I could ever be disappointed. Now, I don't know if I could do work at Literati--for a place with that name, it seems a bit too busy for any sort of literary endeavor--but it is on my cafe radar. But when it comes to places to station yourself for an afternoon of laptop time, I think my picks are elsewhere.

the place: 12081 Wilshire Blvd 90025 - (310) 231-7484
the taste: Light, farm-fresh, American organic.
in five: 4/5

dine out: http://www.literaticafe.com/

ONE SUNSET | dinner

Yes, yes, it's true. Meant to write about this one eons ago. But it's still on the mind, so I thought I'd finally get around to it.

The better part of a month ago, a group of friends and I decided to take advantage of a foodie tradition in Fire City known as Restaurant Week. It's a misnomer, really, as this year's Restaurant Week (which historically lasts a fortnight) actually lasted an entire month. God bless the recession and desperate chefs citywide!

Restaurant Week features some of the best eateries in the city offering prix fixe menus at reduced prices for those who like to scale up when masticating but don't like to part with their hard-earned. Well, I am among that number. So I made a schedule of places to go and things to eat, detailed by cuisine and price, with the intent to eat out at least twice per week for the entire month-long affair.

Alas. Not even this foodie could spare the cash. Luckily, ONE SUNSET was one of the first stops on my still-uncompleted schedule (which, for the record, will remain unfinished indefinitely), so we did make it there, at least. Funny story, though--we didn't do the Restaurant Week menu. Realising upon arrival that we could upgrade for a mere $10 (bringing the meal-sans-drinks total to $45) to the Chef's Tasting Menu, we did that. And boy, what a treat.

From the sweet potato fries to the mac & cheese to the beet salad to the Angus beef sliders (yeah, I didn't eat those--but I did get my own salmon slider, compliments of the chef) to the mushroom flatbread to the fabulous desserts (creme brulee, blueberry bread pudding & red velvet cupcakes!) everything was great. Our server was kind and knowledgeable--and obviously good at her job, seeing as she upgraded us against our intentions--and the ambiance was classy without being pretentious. Perhaps that's because we went on a Thursday night instead of the high-volume Friday or Saturday scenester's dining time. But we were the better for it. Good food was elevated to great thanks to the entire atmosphere of the place. I've already recommended the joint to several friends, none of whom have left hungry or disgruntled, so I say one point to ONE SUNSET. You're not too shabby at all.

the place: 8730 W Sunset Blvd 90069 - (310) 657-0111
the taste: American with a mock-Asian twist.
in five: 3.5/5 (for the fusion factor--you can't score a four if you serve Asian fusion, sorry)

dine out: http://www.onelittlewest12.com/sunset/

samedi 21 mars 2009

TAKEN

The long and short of it is that Liam Neeson took me by surprise (ba-dum-ching!).

I love French films. And this film, despite being helmed by an Irish actor, is French, through and through. Produced by Luc Besson. Financed by most of Europe. Takes place in Paris. Has on-the-nose dialogue that makes you kinda go, "Oookay, is this written badly...or is it written so well it feels bad?"

Ha. That's a trick question. And the answer is, "It's actually a mix of both."

Revolving around the violent kidnapping of a dumb-as-nails, pre-college Daddy's girl in the city of love, TAKEN offers enough action to make up for the mediocre dialogue. Who says older men can't still pack a punch? Liam is definitely still in fine form (thank you, editors), and he is a star. TAKEN will have you tense and riveted as you watch the dad you wish you had tear shit up to get his daughter back. That's unconditional love.

I've always been a fan of Mr. Neeson. From ETHAN FROME (creepy!) to LOVE, ACTUALLY (adorable!) to GUNSHY (so weird!), I find that whatever movie he's in, I like to see him. So if you haven't seen it yet, consider TAKEN and soon. There's a reason why it stayed in the box office top five for over a month. It's worth the rush.

the plot: "Forget it, Kidnapper. It's Liamtown."
the thought: Can classes teach those tricks?
in five: 4/5

get taken: http://www.takenmovie.com/

jeudi 19 mars 2009

Girl's Best Friend: 'I Love You, Man' versus 'Duplicity'

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

There's something about March. When it comes to taking out that special ladybird, there are usually just as many girlie movies that get released in March as during the month of love. But it's sunnier outside, a little bit warmer. And you don't have to buy a diamond necklace to compliment those ticket stubs. I'd guess men with better halves dig this month more than February. So if you're planning on a date at the cinema to celebrate the other month of love, let this be your one-stop guide to choosing the right chick flick: your girl’s best friend (and your guilty pleasure).


This week, we've got a special serving of cinematic romance. First course is the Julia Roberts-Clive Owen starrer, Duplicity, which unites the two familiar hotties for the first time since 2004's Closer, a much darker character study that involved the awkward line, "He tasted like you but sweeter." In Duplicity, the two are con artists in cahoots to scam big who instead end up gaming each other, simply for the sweet pursuit of extended screen time and hijinks. The film is starting to be called a test to see if Julia, who has been raising a child and playing house for a while now, can still hold a box office ransom with her smile. Reviews so far are middling to favorable; I'm sure Mrs. Moder will do quite fine.

But our weekend meal doesn't stop there. Second course is a helping from a platter that's gotten very popular over the last few years--the guy's chick flick. The gick flick, if you will. Well, wait--just did a Google search, and apparently 'gick' is Irish slang for 'shit.' I guess we need a new name...how about Mangina Movie? Defining it now: a MANGINA MOVIE (man + vagina + movie) is a comedic chick flick made for guys. In short, it focuses on a male lead having female problems and overcoming them using both typical female and uncustomary male wiles. In long, it also usually has the crass humor and off-color set pieces that guys tend to enjoy in standard comedies coupled with a love story that guys and girls alike can appreciate. After watching once, men can re-watch mangina movies ad infinitum, claiming they "loved the jokes," when really, a little part of them blossoms into happiness every time they see their bumbling hero learn to love by credits' end.

40 Year Old Virgin is a mangina movie. Knocked Up is a mangina movie. So is Anchorman; so is Superbad...in fact, almost anything produced by Judd Apatow and/or featuring Paul Rudd = MANGINA MOVIE. (And though it doesn't fit this rule: Wedding Crashers? Full of mangina.) But they are all--every single one of them--fantastic. Utterly and almost unerringly lovable. That includes this week's plate #2: I Love You, Man (no, not produced by Apatow but yes, featuring Mr. Yaeger-né-Rudd).

Why she might want to see Duplicity: It's the British lover syndrome. A girl can but dream (and if she closes one eye, hey, maybe Clive is speaking just to her).

Why you might want to see I Love You, Man: Are you kidding? Paul Rudd finally getting a real chance to carry a comedy, and then there are fart jokes, and there's Lou Ferrigno, and there's a little dog, some guitar playing and a masturbation chair, plus Jon Favreau talking dirty to Jaime Pressley, not to mention the shrimp joke from the trailer, and the hot-dog eating and the male bonding, and the pet names and the, the, the...MANGINA.

Why you should both see both: I'll give you five reasons.
1. Who doesn't love a double-feature?
2. So you can both appreciate the term 'slapping the bass'
3. You've both wondered what became of that Mr. and Mrs. Smith sequel
4. Jason Segal & Tom Wilkinson, respectively
5. You were already seventeen once...so do you really want to see 17 Again?

Really, it isn't--and shouldn't be--a contest. There haven't been too many weekends (if any yet) this year that featured multiple, agreeable popcorn flicks that both sexes can enjoy. I'm excited to see Duplicity, and having already seen I Love You, Man, I can tell you that movie is FUNNY. So go. Run, I say. And start early: many theatres offer recession-friendly prices for first showings of the day, even on the weekends.

Now, if you're feeling really ambitious, I would encourage a look at that Zac Efron flick. It looks cute, he is cute, and the movie is family-friendly. But warning: I can't promise it's mangina-free.

mercredi 18 mars 2009

BETTER OFF TED: Preview

This show officially has struck my fancy. Who says there aren't good mid-season replacements?

mercredi 11 mars 2009

Blockbuster Stimulus Package

What a sad/annoying thing it is to try and find a Blockbuster during a recession. They're dropping like flies! I didn't notice it at first, but on my latest look around the street corner, I saw nothing but empty windows. And a sign. "This location has closed."

In an attempt to raise the revenue of the Blockbuster further down the street, I launched into rental mode again. First up was the film noir that informed the OG I wrote about last week, BRICK. I was a mite bit embarrassed that I had alluded to CHINATOWN in my writing but actually had never seen it, so it was time, for Blockbuster's sake and for mine, to remedy that.

CHINATOWN
plot: Water and murder under the bridge.
thought: Is Chinatown really that shady?
in five: 4/5
whose your daughter?: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071315/

I watched CHINATOWN with my friend Tivo, who suggested following it up with the mid-nineties, we-heard-it-was-a-classic BOONDOCK SAINTS. I love-love-love RESERVOIR DOGS and PULP FICTION, both of which were referenced on the back of BOONDOCK's dvd case, so I had high hopes. And since I was in an underbelly-of-the-city kind of place, I knew I was in the right mindset. But BOONDOCK....It was weird. It felt like it was trying to be pulpy but was missing the mark. I know that it came out before QT sprayed bullets from the reservoir, so that means it wasn't trying to imitate these works, even though they seemed to beg comparison. So what was the excuse for the kitsch? I couldn't tell if it was supposed to be grindhouse, like bad for the sake of its genre...or if it was just bad.

BOONDOCK SAINTS
plot: Bible-bashers on a killing spree.
thought: Is this a B-movie...or a bad movie?
in five: 2.5/5
pray or be prey: http://www.boondocksaints.com/

We watched MEMENTO next, and it was good as always. But then the darkness was done; I wasn't looking to wallow in crapulance for the whole weekend. For a little bit of light, I went for the film that fell second to ONCE two years ago--because apparently, you only can have one indie movie starring the musically talented per Awards Season.

AUGUST RUSH
plot: Boy prodigy searches for parents.
thought: Robin Williams exploits children...weird.
in five: 2.5/5 for the movie, but 3/5 for the music
music time: http://augustrushmovie.warnerbros.com/

What's up next, you ask? Well, renting from Blockbuster costs more than it used to, so I'll resort to the DVDs around the apartment for my next rental special. Here's to hoping the entire movie store chain doesn't crumble without my love.

vendredi 6 mars 2009

Overlooked Greatness: 'Brick' (2005)

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

This just in: Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience has underperformed. Expected to make in the area of $30 million, the 3D picture that thought it could has come in at just under $13 million. Now, since it has been heralded as a “concert experience,” I’m not sure if it really qualifies as a movie…but hearing about this sad, un-Miley-like box office implosion, I started wondering to myself: What happened to movies with teen themes? Can’t Hardly Wait…She’s All That…Boys and Girls. The American Pie franchise has been relegated to DVD reprisal, and last I heard, 10 Things I Hate About You is now in development to become a TV series…which seems weird.

Well, here’s what I think happened to movies primarily featuring teen storylines: they sucked. Oh, that might seem like a harsh conclusion—I watched and loved them all, I’ll admit—but what I really mean is that they cloned each other and subsequently became forgettable. That sucks. Road Trip is to Euro Trip what Hannah Montana is to The Brothers Jonas.

The teen films that stand the test of time, you’ll note, are the unique originals, the trailblazers. By nature of the field, however, it’s hard to get uber-original. How many ways can you show puberty reeling its slightly horny head before you’re hips-deep in pie again? Filmmakers must decide to veer off the beaten (get it?) path or risk Death by Duplication. Luckily, Rian Johnson’s wonderful little indie, Brick, has already beaten the seldom explored teen mystery genre—and challenged future noir mysteries in general. Brick, effectively, has blazed the trail, and left nothing but awed soot in its wake. Here’s how:

1.) Noir Factor: Brick is black, black, black, and that is so, so good. With a heavy nod to Polanski’s Chinatown, this film’s aesthetic intensity captivates. If for some reason, your TV speakers break but the image is working fine, know this: you could still watch and enjoy Brick. Can’t do that with Can’t Hardly Wait. With a focus on detective novels like The Maltese Falcon, first-time screenwriter Rian Johnson started his teen detective tale as a novella of sorts, where main character, Brendan, plays our Sam Spade. But in his evident devotion to the genre, Johnson ripped the American detective story in two, creating dual levels: the narrative level, where a “who dunnit?” is solved, and the thematic level, where we, the viewers, explore the effects of teen drug culture in American suburbia. The lens is his paintbrush, and the paint is dark, twisty and beautiful on the big screen canvas.

2.) JGL Factor. That would be Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Yeah, that kid from “Third Rock from the Sun.” You know, I first saw JGL (who I also like to refer to as “Hotness Walking”) in Holy Matrimony opposite Patricia Arquette when I was about 10 years old. I remember thinking to myself, “That kid will one day be Hotness Walking.” He was talented then, as a Hutterite on the verge of arranged marriage, and he has only grown. JGL is a man who rarely disappoints. I will see anything he’s in, because he chooses riveting work and plays his roles with mind-bending intensity. Yeah, even on “Third Rock from the Sun,” and again in that teen number, 10 Things I Hate About the Fact that 10 Things I Hate About You Might Become a TV Show (we can discuss that later). His body of work has been described as “acclaimed and underseen,” and you know what, Boston Herald, I agree with you. Because if Joseph Gordon-Levitt says he’s an alien, I believe him. He says he’s a nerd, I believe him. He says he’s mentally challenged, a prostitute, physically disabled or—in this case—a teenage detective out to avenge his missing girlfriend; I believe him. His presence alone will draw you in.

3.) Addictively indie. Much like this year’s Best Picture Oscar winner, Slumdog Millionaire (and many other movies, might I add) Brick tread a long path to the big screen. With Slumdog, Danny Boyle and his team achieved what others would never have attempted to try on $7 million. Originally penned in 1996, Brick took nearly ten years to hit the art house circuit, and that was after being whittled down to a $475,000 budget! They faked the special effects with a bit of creativity and edited the rest like mad. After all that, the writer still was able to work out a deal with Fox Searchlight, the distributor, and hence to this day, he offers his entire, annotated shooting script for anyone to read and download online. That’s right: “Free on the internet.” That is so indie, it’s like listening to Radiohead and Fleet Foxes at the same time. You gotta respect a filmmaker who honors the unspoken artist’s covenant: though shalt share thine art—at any cost.

4.) The name game. You know you’re really floating in a pool of noir once you encounter a character that goes by something like “Acey,” “Sonny” or by “The [Insert Noun]” in an already dark film. Well, Brick has “The Brain,” JGL’s partner in solving crime, and “The Pin,” our post-teen, bad guy extraordinaire. Five minutes in, and you’ll guess right away: Something’s up, and it ain’t what you thought. Though our lead is simply “Brendan,” the softness of that name defines him entirely: he’s in this for love, and love will put up a fight. Other character names do not disappoint, however. There’s also Tug (bad guy) and Dode (bad guy) and a slew of knick-names for outliers, like “Dangle” and “Flatfoot.” Between these names and the stylized, genre-loving dialogue, it’s almost hard to keep up with the plot. But don’t worry: this is a movie you’ll want to see twice, so just pick it up on the next viewing. Or read the script for free on the internet!

5.) Score. That is to say, the music tracks. Pays to have a multi-platinum record producer in the family. Brick’s writer, Rian, has that brother—his name is Aaron. But the music talent didn’t stop there. Rian’s cousin, Nathan, reined over this composition. Rumor (read: wikipedia) has it that Brick was scored mostly by way of iChat, i.e., Rian sent clips of his film-in-progress from Los Angeles to his cousin in New York, who scored on the go at the reduced, family rate. With further help from The Cinematic Underground, an indie (natch), alt-rock group, Brick’s score came together. The music in this film is telling and adds to the surreal nature of the action. Again, if your TV choked for a couple hours and all that worked was the sound—put the DVD in anyway. You’ll be alright.

Now some might say that Brick is a little over the top in its noir-ittude. The lingo, the name game, the score, the Hotness Walking…these are all elements that collectively strike a pose as recognizable as Heidi Klum’s on the catwalk. This film is making a statement. And it’s going to hit you over the head with it a little bit. Repeat viewings, however, will reveal that the artistry supporting this statement is fairly intact. And because the man behind Brick also scribed the upcoming The Brothers Bloom (starring Adrien Brody and Rachel Weisz), we can guess that he is not a one-trick pony.

I have yet to see Brothers Bloom, but I’m excited to see the next step in Rian Johnson’s repertoire. Bloom looks like a comedy, which already differentiates it from Brick. I suggest getting your hands on Brick before heading forward, get to know Rian a little. Embrace this journey, and you will feel artistically revitalized afterwards, I can almost guarantee it. You also may never want to watch She’s the Man again. It’s an unfortunate side effect of enlightenment.

jeudi 5 mars 2009

Girl's Best Friend: The Comic Book Superhero

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

She's the perfect girlfriend. She's funny, smart, complicated in a good way, and she looks better in your t-shirts than you do. Don't let that girl get away; treat her right. If you know she likes resort vacations, get that job you just lost back, because you can't fly to Bali in your Camry. If you know she likes movies, well then, lucky you--your job is half done: Here is your one-stop guide to discovering the only one of your girl’s best friends you're allowed to watch, touch and secretly love (and your chance to admit to the inner girl in you).


Given the paragraph above, you should know that, if you're reading this, I already think highly of your girlfriend. And if I think highly of your girlfriend, then I'm automatically assuming she doesn't twitter away her days discussing nothing but the lighter side of Kate Hudson's film repertoire. A real girl likes real movies. Thus, if your girl really is so great as to deserve a movie date this weekend, she has probably already bought tickets to go see Watchmen. I don't say that because the reviews have been astounding (they haven't) or I've seen an advanced screening and pre-emptively approve it (I haven't); I say it because it's movie history, and any true lover of movies must be at least a little bit curious.

If the lady and you do have plans to see Watchmen, then...I can bet you already know a bit about it. If it's the lady herself who has requested the fanboy sojourn, however, you might do a bit of homework. Read about it here and there, and then ask yourself...what's the appeal? Is it the Historical Movie Moment Factor (TM), i.e., the fact that the most loved comic ever is hitting the big screen? Is it the 300-style, eye-popping graphics and special effects? Is it her not-so-secret Alan Moore obsession? Her slightly curious Billy Crudup obsession? Maybe. But it's also the curiosity wrought from seeing multiple masked women and men of mystery blow up the big screen. Ladies love the superhero.

Let me clarify: not all ladies love collecting material goods based on the superhero, repeatedly discussing the superhero, verbally admonishing the superhero, or in other ways treating the superhero as if he or she were a real person. But...ladies love the superhero.

That fantastically capable demi-god from comic book lore has gotten a lot of face-time recently. With The Dark Knight and Iron Man (and you can throw in the opening number with Hugh Jackman from last month's Academy Awards in lieu of the upcoming X-Men Origins: Wolverine), you might wonder what's left to see out there. Well, let's revisit recent comics-turned-movies that pump up the presence of the atypical superhero: the average guy wronged by life. In the event you want your weekend to go comic book-crazy, here are suggestions of a few adapted greats that any perfect girl would love to watch with you:

OLD BOY (2003)
Plot: After fifteen years in jail, a man embarks to avenge his wrongful imprisonment.
Pluses: He's not a superhero, but you do get to root for the underdog, watch some startling beat-downs, laugh, cry, cringe and be amazed for two full hours.
Minuses: "Laugh and the world laughs with you. Weep and you weep alone."
If she likes it, also consider: Sympathy for Lady Vengeance

GHOST WORLD (2001)
Plot: Two post-high school misfits pretend to befriend Steve Buscemi.
Pluses: Scarlett Johansson in one of a small number of roles in which she isn't attempting to break up a marriage.
Minuses: Few from my vantage point.
If she likes it, also consider: Napoleon Dynamite, who really could star in his own comic book.

AKIRA (1988)
Plot: A biker boy amped up by the government goes on a killing spree. Hijinks ensue.
Pluses: Oldie but a goodie. From start to finish, it's one blast of excitement after another.
Minuses: You might risk wetting your pants, which may threaten to wreck the mood.
If she likes it, also consider: Ghost in the Shell

AMERICAN SPLENDOR (2003)
Plot: The title says it, really. It's American life in all its splendid normalcy.
Pluses: Paul Giamatti plays our title character, Harvey Pekar, with splendor.
Minuses: It waxes a bit depressing (as does America).
If she likes it, also consider: Persepolis

PERSEPOLIS (2006)
Plot: Based on and drawn by the author of the graphic novels of the same name, this film tells the coming-of-age story of an Iranian girl during and after the Islamic Revolution.
Pluses: It's black and white hand animation, which looks really cool.
Minuses: Will remind you of the glaring fact you are not well-traveled, Bali aside.
If she likes it, also consider: Waltz with Bashir

SIN CITY (2005)
Plot: Basin City is a mess!
Pluses: Fabulously cast, stylistically slick, and with a kiss from Tarantino, visually compelling.
Minuses: Sets you up to expect a really cool sequel, which has yet to be delivered.
If she likes it, also consider: Not seeing The Spirit

X2: X-MEN UNITED (2003)
Plot: United they stand.
Pluses: Bryan Singer.
Minuses: X-men 3: The Last Stand
If she likes it, also consider: Watchmen!

There you have it, a small collection of comic books adapted to movies that are snuggle time-ready and girl-approved. Sure, a few are violent, but isn't life but A History of Violence? No matter your comic genre preference, do let me know if there are other flicks you would suggest!

If you manage to set the mood right via any of the films above, you might just go for broke and try to segue into a little Guitar Hero or Halo 3 to finish your evening. That is, if you didn't want to get any below the guitar action. Otherwise, put the lights down low and get ready to watch Neo-Tokyo explode.

Slacking at the bit (rentals & remorse)

Lately, I've been perma-exhausted in the worst way, and I don't even know why. Maybe it's all the lack of sleep. But you know, I would sleep more if I wasn't so busy. I'd be less busy if I didn't have a job. In a crumbling economy, however, the ability to work isn't something over which one should openly fret. It's distasteful. Almost as distasteful as me consistently konking out on the couch while watching TV nearly every evening. What to do to cure this state of accidental-comatose...caffeine? Coffee does tend to make a day pass more quickly. So do movie rentals.

Last week was grand, saw a small number of great flicks. First up, however, I finally--finally--gave up my quest to watch SUPERSTAR. I've more or less seen the movie, in bits in pieces, over the last ten years of my life, but about a month ago, I decided I wanted to, at long last, watch the whole kit-n-kaboodle in one clean squat. Unfortunately...exhaustion swept in. I've tried watching SUPERSTAR, in the last month, about four times. I'm done trying. My tivo is done holding onto it, too. DELETE. I trust it's funny, and you know what? I got the gist. "Sexually nervous girl with a crush on the school dance-jock actually ends up falling for a misfit, stuttering bad boy." YAY.

I also begrudgingly deleted MR. WOODCOCK from my tivo bin (is there a name for that, really? bin? queue? menu? list? or just always, obligatorily "tivo," tout court?). Sorry, Sean William Scott. Billy Thornton. Susan Sarandon. I tried.

Now, onto what I actually did see.

In preparation for the super-fun of TAKEN, I had a hankering to watch some Liam Neeson. Caught the under-the-radar action-comedy GUN SHY (2000), which was quirky and satisfying. In it, Liam plays an undercover cop who witnesses a horrifying gangster coup while he's on duty and hence needs a bit of counseling to coax him to revisit his role as bad guy mediator. Co-stars Sandra Bullock, looking lovelier than usual, and Oliver Platt, playing a guy named Fulvio...which is neat. It was weird, a little unfocused, but witty, and it made for a nice character study.

GUN SHY
plot: A plea for gun control.
thought: When does Bullock get TAKEN?
in five: 3/5
shoot 'em up, wuss: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0171356/

Next up was another throw back: Steven Soderbergh's SEX, LIES AND VIDEOTAPE. I didn't realise how far back I was throwing, however--I'd actually been under the impression that SLV was rather recently released, though now I don't know why. The minute James Spader came on the screen, I was like, "Wait, what?" But I still was figuring it for late nineties--until I saw Peter Gallagher. Ok. He's aged well, but this was not Gallagher from "The OC." Clearly, I should have caught the time period from the shoulder pads on Andie MacDowell, but forgive me. Despite its 1989 release, the film feels incredibly modern. The dialogue in SLV is amazing, and the deliberate pacing drew me in remarkably--slow, without a hint of lassitude. Spader's character is not as "realised" as I would like, but I basically forgive it, thanks to the cohesion of every other moment.

SEX, LIES AND VIDEOTAPE
plot: Videotapes and lies about sex
thought: No, really, that's about it.
in five: 4/5
tape it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098724/

Heading in a different direction, thematically (but in the same direction, temporally), I scaled back to 1988 next with BIG, the Tom Hanks starrer that I can't believe I haven't seen until now. It's adorable--and so is David Moscow, who plays Tom Hanks' character's childhood self, the young Josh. I just looked up Moscow to see where he's been all these years since (and what he looks like now, natch), because in BIG, he looked every bit like Kirk Cameron, and I seriously saw him and had a JGL-in-Holy-Matrimony moment...but I guess something went awry, because history has proven me wrong. The world hasn't seen much of Moscow since, well, NEWSIES and that short-lived but kinda funny show on the WB, "Zoe, Duncan, Jack & Jane." Well, at least the world finished off okay--we still got Tom Hanks.

BIG
plot: Boy wishes to be big!
thought: Has sex with a woman!
in five: 4/5
they grow up so fast: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094737/

So...in the title of this post, I also promised remorse. I was being melodramatic, perhaps. I do have a bit of remorse--I still haven't written about my visit to ONE SUNSET, where I enjoyed the chef's tasting menu and reached a moderate level of food bliss, nor have I talked about LITERATI CAFE, my new favorite lunch stop on the west side--close to work and delicious, both of which recommend it to my palate. Cheap soups, too. Furthermore, I have yet to discuss my thoughts on TAKEN (loved it), or start posting recipes, a dream I've been toying with for some time now. I cook more these days (thanks, Recession), and I like to experiment. Sometimes I pass...other times, I kinda fail. But listen, don't let anyone tell you not to try.

Voila, there it is, my remorse. I want to write these things, but not sure if I really will. REMORSE! Well, if I don't end up doing it, I've already (sort of) apologised here, so...deal with it, Cate Blanchett. We'll be in touch.

jeudi 26 février 2009

Girl's Best Friend: A Post-Madea America

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

Weren't the Oscars grand? All that song and dance just made you feel like a kid again. Hugh Jackman's opening number also probably reminded you that you never saw The Reader. Well, let me save you the trouble: the film wasn't re-writing history. What you expected should happen at the end of the Nuremberg Trials is exactly what happens. Supwise! So it's officially time to move into the lighter fare of springtime. Whether your lady wants to see Jonas Brothers: the 3D Concert Experience or rent HSM3 (both are STELLAR options), let this be the one-stop guide to discovering The Chick Flick: your girl’s best friend (and the window to the inner girl in you).


The title of this week's post might be a bit misleading. I'm not writing much about Madea, despite the fact that she probably deserves to go to jail by now. What I will reflect on briefly, however, is the fact that, despite the huge success of Tyler Perry's admittedly puerile films, Hollywood is still systematically disconnected from awareness of the draw of the ethnic audience. Word on the street is that Perry is now making plans to take his franchise global. So we're no more in a post-Medea America than we are in a post-racial America, despite the fact that Barack Obama is king.

But separate from the Madea franchise, there is, historically, some great girl cinema with predominantly colored casts. What happened to the days of Waiting to Exhale (which hey, I didn't know at the time, was directed by Forest Whitaker) and What's Love Got to Do with It? And remember How Stella Got Her Groove Back? (A lot of sex with Taye Diggs, that's how!) Now, it's been re-made by Lifetime with Heather Locklear seducing a--supwise--young, white man (the delicious Robert Buckley), and it's called Flirting with Forty. I'm pretty sure it has aired every weekend since it's December release date. Apparently, a lot of women want to flirt once they're forty. But...come on, why the whitening treatment?

This all, in case you were wondering, is coming off the heels of my belated realisation that He's Just Not That Into Monogamy, my GBF from three weeks ago, boasted some starkly uni-color casting, give or take a couple gay men and chatty interview women. I kind of assumed the film was attempting to be representative of the spectrum of modern dating experiences in America...and perhaps I was giving it too much credit there...but having actually quite enjoyed the film, I now am left wondering: Where are the interracial relationships? Why no Blasian babies?

In revolt against this ever-expanding romcom norm, therefore, I'd like you and your lover to consider re-visiting some ethnically and culturally colored romantic classics of the recent past. Beyond the three I've listed above, please consider the following rentals:

VOLVER (2006)
Why I'm recommending it: Single, strong-willed, Spanish females.
What you'll say recommends it:
- Pedro Almodovar directed it.
- Penelope was nominated for a Best Actress Oscar for her role in this film.
- The entire female cast won the Best Actress award at the Cannes Film Festival.
- You don't watch enough films with subtitles these days.
What you might really be thinking: Penelope is hot.
What your girl might be thinking: Penelope is hot.

HITCH (2005)
Why I'm recommending it: Look at that; a bi-racial couple.
What you'll say recommends it:
- It's kind of the guy's version of He's Just Not That Into (Talking to) You
- #1 performing box-office romantic comedy of 2005.
- It's a Will Smith movie, and it can't be any worse than Wild, Wild West.
What you might really be thinking: Eva Mendes!
What your girl might be thinking: You could use some dating training.

LOVE & BASKETBALL (2000)
Why I'm recommending it: Sports + sex; what's not to love?
What you'll say recommends it:
- Sports + sex; what's not to love?
- It's better than Something New (sorry, Simon Baker), but it still has Sanaa Lathan.
What you might really be thinking: Window into the pro-basketball possibilities you failed to pursue early in life.
What your girl might be thinking: Yeah, right.

L'AUBERGE ESPAGNOLE (2002)
Why I'm recommending it: A stew of European young adults living the good life.
What you'll say recommends it:
- Cedric Klapisch is a phenomenal director. Romain Duris is a great actor.
- Audrey Tautou is in it. Remember her? From Amelie?
- Again, a +1 to your effort to enjoy reading subtitles.
- The entire film is a metaphor for the formation of the European Union, so it's almost like a history lesson. And it is, in fact, an apt look at European education, careers and the crooked path it takes to get through either.
What you might really be thinking: Audrey Tautou-la-la.
What your girl might be thinking: New summer plan: vacation to Barcelona!

IMAGINE ME & YOU (2005)
Why I'm recommending it: Lovely little lesbian love story (ack! over-kill on the alliteration...), despite the lack of an ethnically diverse cast.
What you'll say recommends it:
- 10th highest grossing rom-com of 2006, for what that's worth.
- Features Piper Parabo doing a fantastic British accent. Features Matthew Goode being a fantastic British man.
- It's not easy coming out...and there's something you've been meaning to tell her....
What you might really be thinking: Don't see nearly enough lesbians on the HDTV these days.
What your girl might be thinking: Yeah, right.

WHY DID I GET MARRIED?
Why I'm recommending it: Since Tyler Perry was my tipping point, thought I should offer something he did...and until the most recent Madea Goes to Jail, this was his best-performing film.
What you'll say recommends it:
- The only two rom-coms that outpaced it in 2007 were Knocked Up and Enchanted, and you already saw both of those (thus becoming, to this day, a lovable mix of McDreamy and Seth Rogen).
- Based on Tyler Perry's stage play of the same name. Love the theatre, but a DVD is easier to bring home with you.
- Addresses a very key relationship question.
What you might really be thinking: Hopefully will answer said question, for the sake of your future relationship(s).
What your girl might be thinking: Are you trying to tell her something?

You know what I notice? Quite simply, as evidenced by HJNTIY, many films before it, and even some of the choices I've listed above, most romantic comedies are more than a little "uni-colored." It is reflective of America, where most couples are still of the same demographic, be that racial, social, monetary, ethnic or religious. I live in a city, so I see more mixing around me, but let's face it--we're usually attracted to those that look like us. Romantic comedies display that. And except for movie stars like Will Smith or, I suppose, Simon Baker, who have managed to cross the color line, most audiences don't want to see mainstream mixing. Why hasn't that changed? Clearly, the need for Madea has not yet diminished.

Well, at any rate, should you pick one of these GBF's to watch this weekend, let me know your thoughts. And if you have other mainstream movies (or those of the wide-released-via-art house persuasion) that you feel have Will Smith'd the big screen, let me know. I'm curious.

mercredi 25 février 2009

Hugh Jackman hosting the Oscars

GREAT SUCCESS.



THR liked you, too.

Good show. I guessed 19/24 categories right, which is an all-time high...but I did not win my Oscar pool. Who invited that clown who guessed 22/24?!

Oh wait. I did.

Sunday night was grand. The empty champagne bottles in my trunk prove it.

jeudi 19 février 2009

THE INTERNATIONAL

Yeah.

It's true.

Clive Owen? He's still hot. Don't act so surprised.

In THE INTERNATIONAL, Mr. Owen plays the part of Louis Salinger, a questionable agent with a questionable past who wants to bring down the largest international bank. Motive? Questionable activity. But really, that's not the point. If you're watching THE INTERNATIONAL, you're clearly in it for the ride, not the destination; the pacing matters much more than the plot. And there, THE INTERNATIONAL shines.

Tight with an accelerated feel aided by a stylishly emotive score, the pulse of this film is its most alluring feature. The soundtrack supports every scene, and even though one might kind of notice a plot hole or two (for instance, how did Salinger get as far as he's gotten in his investigation without any attempts on his life?), for the most part, the score anchors the action so that everything happening does more or less feel right.

Now, there is a bit off about THE INTERNATIONAL. It's a movie about international banking while most of the world economy is in a recession. It's also a bank thriller where no money actually changes hands. On top of that, it's a movie about bringing down a bank whose lead character spends a lot of money traveling internationally and destroying a lot of expensive things. But hey, let's move past those things temporarily so we can take a long, lingering look at Clive.

More troubled than in movies past, Clive Owen's sporting a fixedly brooding expression that makes his face look like it's been beat with a sexy stick, so clearly, despite his lackluster duo of emotional levels (he can show you "intense" or--wait for it--"intenser"), Owen obviously steals the show. Naomi Watts is sadly just there for filler. Owen's dark gaze is set to "high smolder," and caught up in the smolderyness of it all, you really, really want him to bring this bank down.

But that's one man attempting the impossible. Hate to spoil it for you (if wikipedia hasn't already, that is), but in battles with big business, big business usually wins. Even when some other guy wins, big business wins. How do I figure? Because big business runs shit. And that other guy? He's a little shit. So guess what? Big business runs that other guy.

Clive Owen's character, Louis Salinger, is "that other guy." He works for Interpol (The International Criminal Police Organization), which basically is the world police. They stop people your local sheriff doesn't know about. But they can only move as wide or aim as high as the worldwide corruption of the justice system will allow them to go. And alas, Salinger just doesn't get it. The final showdown between Salinger and the CEO of the fictional International Bank of Business and Credit (played cockily by Ulrich Thomsen) finally impresses upon Salinger his "little shit" status. You can chase, you can fight, you can investigate and hack away at the evidence as much as you want. But cut one arm off, Sali, and it'll grow right back. 'Cause that's how big banks roll.

It's a little...underwhelming to note that as the key takeaway from the film--not because we can't handle the truth, but because we get the sense that Salinger can't. It felt like all this intensity was building and building--and ultimately it was for nothing. Salinger, naive and alone, has driven all his energy into this single quest. And for what? For me to eat stale popcorn and wonder if his eyes are naturally that blue? Fine. Great success. But next time I want to see Clive Owen looking volatile and depressed, I think I'll just watch KING ARTHUR. Can't say no to chain mail.

plot: One man against the bank.
thought: Can I get cash back?
in five: 2.5/5

recess THIS!: http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/theinternational/site/

dimanche 15 février 2009

Overlooked Greatness: 'American Outlaws' (2001)

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

I can guess what you must be thinking. A cowboy movie? With Colin Farrell? Yes, you’re right. It was an unknown Irishman playing a classic American cowboy—and Jesse James, to boot. It’s everything wrong, and perhaps that’s why, seven years ago when I first heard about it, I was immediately intrigued.

Unless watching gay cowboys who are in love with each other, I’ve never been that much of a Western fan. I’m not saying that to immediately discredit any words I might share about this particular Western (though that might be the result). I’m saying it, in fact, to bolster the film’s credibility. It didn’t spin itself as an historical drama. It’s a popcorn flick with some horses thrown in, and if you think of it that way, you’re already saddled up for a smoother ride. But if you need further convincing, hopefully that’s where the following Five Factors of Greatness come in.

1. Colin Farrell: We know the Hollywood Talent Trajectory™ by now: Early Speculation of Star Status leads to Quagmire of Cocaine, which leads to 100 Years of Solitude, which leads to Awesome Phoenix-Like Rebirth. Note those who spun out early (River Phoenix) and those who have finished the journey (Mickey Rourke). Having just won a Golden Globe for his wonderful portrayal of a hitman with heart in the BAFTA Award-winning In Bruges, Farrell has come out of the quagmire of cocaine and is on his way back to potential Phoenix Status. And I’ll argue that American Outlaws, Farrell’s second American film, was a hint to the masses about what was in store. Though it might be a stretch to say he was “discovered” thanks to this film (he did act for Schumacher a year prior in Tigerland), it definitely helped put him on the HTT ™ and defined him as a heartthrob to watch. In Outlaws we get to see Farrell act two roles: swashbuckling ne’er do well and hopeless romantic. It’s sweet, endearing, youthful and exciting. Someone else might have made more sense for a Jesse James, but Farrell made this Jesse James all his. (And as an aside: Kathy Bates plays his mom. Love her.)

2. Dialogue: There are some truly great lines in this film. From “Hey! You wanna die?” to “It’s going to be a long [insert season],” Outlaws always makes me smile. It is memorably quotable, and the only reason people don’t think about the dialogue’s repeatability is—well, there are two reasons. One, not enough people have seen this movie, and two, when it isn’t Will Ferrell-funny or Meryl Streep-dramatic, less people care to play along. I know quotes from small films like Napoleon Dynamite or Juno have eked through, thanks to the portrayal of the offbeat American family behaving in an offbeat way, so there’s got to be room for an offbeat American western in our memories somewhere. Right? I love “This is one doodle that can’t be undid, Home Skillet” (Juno), just as much as I love, “Younger-James gang? Is there an older James gang?” And that’s why I watch and re-watch this movie every year. The quotes never get old, and the fun never wanes.

3. Robin Hood factor: The heart of this Jesse James story is simple. When the railroad company tries to shoulder its way through his family’s homestead, Jesse and his band unite to bring them down, one bank at a time, while providing their neighbors with both physical and financial security. In short, he and his posse steal from the rich and give to the poor. Well, there’s something about stickin’ it to the Man that always makes for a winning plotline. We like the underdog (or the “slumdog,” if you will), the upstart, the gangster with a heart of gold. And you can’t help but root for him in his quest—especially if he’s got a face like Colin Farrell.

4. Butchering of history for entertainment’s sake: Like I mentioned before, Outlaws never intended—or at least I hope it didn’t intend—to be an historical drama. It is neither a history lesson nor a biopic. Who knows if it got the Jesse James and the Younger Brothers’ story right? I’m going to assume it did, pop some popcorn, and move on with my movie night. It’s this same ability to ignore the details in favor of some amusement that lets us enjoy Shakespeare in Love (another perennial favorite of mine). And though, clearly, Shakespeare is the “better” film, both that film and this one operate with the same premise: get the basics down, and then have a laugh. If you like a bit (or a lot) of cheese with your popcorn, Outlaws will taste just right.

5. The tagline and the trailer. They are both seriously so bad, the film just has to be good. Now, obviously when I say “good,” I don’t mean Amistad-good. But in its own, wonky way, American Outlaws is great, and both the tagline and trailer tell you why. With all the guns and action, Outlaws channels more than a bit of 1988’s Young Guns but it uses one-too-many Moby songs (i.e., one) to get to this point. Watch the trailer, and you won’t be able to figure out if you’re in post-Civil War America or in 2001: A Musical Odyssey, in which the members of the band Saliva decide to become cowboy bank robbers. But filter your confusion towards the tagline of the film: “Bad is Good Again.” Um…that says it all. Outlaws doesn’t take itself seriously, and that’s its strength. Bad is good again. And I’m watching.

I think the leading fault of American Outlaws is that it doesn’t quite embrace a genre. Above, I referred to it as an “offbeat American Western,” but that’s not entirely how it sold itself. Outlaws tight-roped between offbeat and ordinary, and there was its undoing. It wasn’t quite clear if viewers should take the film seriously or not. Was it a true telling of the legend of Jesse James? Was it a farcical remake of an American tall tale? Or was it just another shoot-‘em-up comedy with some famous names haphazardly thrown in? Unwilling to pick sides, Outlaws alienated most critics and viewers alike, succumbing to meager box office receipts and thus, obscurity.

But to this day, American Outlaws is the most watched film I own in my DVD collection. Perhaps that’s a little weird. But that’s not to say it’s my favorite film; it just never really gets old to me. Every time Scott Caan shouts, “Let’s ride!” I get into it all over again. It is familiar and fantastic, and it’s truly so bad it gets better every time.

vendredi 13 février 2009

I am my own Urban Dictionary V

Term: class up

Definition 1: To make classy

Definition 2: To take on the attributes of a social or monetary status higher than your own, at times by way of unnecessary embellishments.

Examples of usage:
1. I like how you classed up your office with those Andy Warhol posters.
2. Mitch tried to class-up his 2001 Sebring by adding nice rims, but alas, he should have just bought a cooler car.

jeudi 12 février 2009

Girl's Best Friend: A Case of V-Day

**This article also appears on RopeofSilicon.com.**

She loves you; she loves you not. Isn't that the silent inquiry of the month? That, and what can you do to MAKE her love you? Roofies are out--that's not love. So is a trip to The Cheesecake Factory--they don't take reservations. You actually can't make her do anything; but if your lady is eying you softly, consider a movie to break the ice. Keep in mind not any movie will do. This is V-Day. Surrender all dignity at the ticket booth on behalf of your maybe-love. And once you do, let this be the one-stop guide to satisfying your girl’s best Valentine's (and helping the inner Cupid in you).


Chocolates, roses, flowers, a private jet, a spa massage. Though they're old standards, in today's economic climate, it's probably difficult to think of treating your lady to all of these. Well, if you can't afford to take her shopping, you can always just take her to see this week's new chick flick, Confessions of a Shopaholic.

Why she might want to see it: A vicarious NYC shopping spree coupled with the chance to vicariously date someone more British than you.

Why you might not: You don't "speak Prada," nor do you plan on taking a class to learn how.

The silver lining: Two hours of your V-Day love treatment are already resolved! No antibiotics required.

Tips for the untrained:
- This flick stars Borat's girlfriend, the feisty redhead from Wedding Crashers, Isla Fisher. Here, she seems to be acting with similar levels of feist, which invariably implies there will be moments of real humor...and moments of slight annoyance. Just prepare yourself. Also keep in mind that she embodies many of the eccentricities ladies try to keep under wraps, so for the most part, we kind of like her.
- Is it just me, or is it easy to confuse Isla Fisher with Amy Adams? I think I've spotted an emerging difference: this time of year, Adams goes critically acclaimed, Isla goes commercial, both tend to shoot and score. So yes, they do both have red hair. But unless you want to get depressed by seeing Doubt again, maybe don't dwell on it.
- If you missed He's Just Not that Into You last week (I'm banking you were dying to see it), consider a femme-friendly double feature this weekend. Then consider learning the differences between Prada and Old Navy.
- Since it is Valentine's, explore the opportunities you have to work this movie into an overall V-Day theme. Gift certificate to her favorite store? Take her dancing? Get her a new, bright pink laptop? Teach her how to use Google? Whatever you do, don't buy her Prada. Because if she likes what you buy...and she probably will...you will be battling the recession much longer than you think.

Valentine's may be a chocolate-coated, Hallmark-constructed phenomenon, but it's allure for men is still there. Whatever you do, however small, will get you noticed. If you're panicking about V-Day, maybe you should wonder why. Are you projecting the panic of your relationship against a calendar? Don't. Times are tough, and it's the simple things that count. Pair a single red rose with movie tickets and add a bottle of champs for good measure, and you're already on your way back from being mediocre just weeks before. Cook her dinner at home, and you've both impressed/amused her and saved yourself the prix-fixe fare at any of your local, upscale eateries.

If you are courting a lady who likes her movies like she likes her men (action-packed and with popcorn), you do have some other options this weekend, such as The International starring Clive Owen. Recall Clive's hotness, however, before you schedule that date. Taken with Liam Neeson is still enjoying favorable buzz, but if fluttering love is the theme du jour, perhaps consider Two Lovers, the Gwyneth Paltrow/Joaquin Phoenix picture that flutters into limited release just in time for you to wonder why you only have one lover. Above all, keep it stress free, and have fun. Chick flicks may be her best friend, but I bet she's into you, too.

mardi 10 février 2009

Rent Your Face Off: two weeks, 11.5 movies

I've had comedy on the mind for some time now. And given the lack of good cinema fare, I decided to bring the cinema home to me. I mean, come on. My tv is the size of your mom before she "called Jenny." Bigger, even. And thus commenced the TiVo-tastic boob tube fest and Blockbuster rental-rama.

First up, an off-beat movie about cops. Or a cop movie about beating off? There is a lot of sexual innuendo enshrouded in the Reno Police force. You be the judge.

RENO 911: MIAMI
plot: Incompetent squad saves Miami Beach.
thought: Meow I wanna watch SUPER TROOPERS.
in five: 2.5/5
A little more Reno

Now, I know the show "Extras" isn't a movie, but I'd been dying to catch an episode for some time. Didn't get around to it until the season finale, and hey, it was two hours. So I'm counting it as half a movie.

EXTRAS: EXTRA SPECIAL SEASON FINALE
plot: Ricky Gervais gets cocky, loses dignity.
thought: Glimpse the natural Hollywood trajectory.
in five: 3.5/5
A few more extras

I liked the idea of the next movie (also a TiVo find), because I've never met a black guy who only dates white girls. Well, apparently, that man doesn't exist.

I'M THROUGH WITH WHITE GIRLS (THE INEVITABLE UNDOING OF JAY BROOKS)
plot: Black man dates black woman.
thought: There's no hope for interracials?
in five: 3/5
A little less biracial dating

I like Owen Wilson, and YOU, ME AND DUPREE was airing commercial-free. I don't like rom-coms, so I wasn't expecting to really like it...and I didn't...so there you go.

YOU, ME AND DUPREE
plot: Kate Hudson's husband thinks she's cheating (with co-star Owen Wilson).
thought: And we have to watch.
in five: 2/5
A little more Michael Douglas

Classic Jim Carrrey ahead! And isn't that his best stuff? I'm a mega-fan of TRUMAN SHOW, and I very much enjoyed FUN WITH DICK & JANE, but I think LIAR, LIAR is the movie--more than any of the Ace Ventura's--that explains why so many people would pay money to watch this guy contort his face and act the fool. He's over the top. He's a little annoying. But he's classic, comedy gold.

LIAR, LIAR
plot: A lawyer tries out honesty.
thought: Jim Carrey as a serious actor.
in five: 4/5
Full-length film on Hulu.com

Meant to catch IN BRUGES when it came out in theatres, so when my friend TiVo brought it over for movie night, I jumped at the chance. Colin Farrell does not disappoint. I want this film to win the Oscar for Original Screenplay.

IN BRUGES
plot: Hitman hides out in Lametown.
thought: Sweetly glorious in its simplicity.
in five: 4/5
A little more Belgium nightlife

Anthony Minghella was a very respected director, and I haven't been exposed much to his work. This is why I was thrilled to see THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY, which my friend Curly Beast counts as one of her favorite films. I liked it, but I wasn't prepared for where it went. And it left me with too many questions, the simplest being...why the heck didn't Mr. Ripley leave Europe to escape the mess he was in? No answers.

TALENTED MR. RIPLEY
plot: Matt Damon pales in comparison to Jude Law.
thought: See above.
in five: 3.5/5
A little more creepy time

After that darkness, I wanted something light, easy to handle. I'd heard that SHALLOW HAL was cuter than you might think years ago, and it fit the mood I was in. It was, of course, mildly ridiculous. And Jack Black hadn't quite found his big screen groove yet, I'd argue. But I saw where he was going, and I love him now. Go, Jack, go.

SHALLOW HAL
plot: Asshole unknowingly dates fat girl.
thought: Cuter than you might think.
in five: 3/5
A few more fat jokes

Another overlooked release from a few years back that ended up on the TiVo. It aired on the LOGO Network, which is a gay cable network I'd never watched before, but fast-forwarding through the commercials while leisurely taking in IMAGINE ME & YOU around 1am one weeknight, I've got one thing to say about LOGO: you look hilarious. I'm not in your demo, but I might just watch some of your shows anyway.

IMAGINE ME & YOU
plot: Closet lesbian discovers her vagina.
thought: Time to return wedding presents!
in five: 3/5
A little more lesbian love

Ohhhh Sacha Baron Cohen. You're too much. I love that he got so many lawsuits after making this movie, and I also love that he didn't break character once. Clutch move. Have you ever seen him as himself, like at an awards show? He's almost boring. That's a comedic gift.

BORAT: CULTURAL LEARNINGS OF AMERICA FOR MAKE BENEFIT GLORIOUS NATION OF KAZAKHSTAN
plot: Faux-Kazakh man makes faux-documentary.
thought: Mocking America usually plays well.
in five: 3.5/5
A little more SBC craziness

I'd never even heard of TOOTSIE until about three months ago, but then suddenly, someone was bringing it up in conversation almost every five days. After some UCLA instructor told me I should see it, I finally said, "OKAY!" Had no clue what it was about. But turns out, that doesn't matter, because when a screenplay is well written, you get on board right away.

TOOTSIE
plot: Faux-woman becomes TV sensation.
thought: He's in drag...and it works.
in five: 3.5/5
A little more cross-dressing

TOOTSIE did run long, I'll say, but it was funny. The final and twelfth film I watched in the last two weeks was work-related, but I am so, so glad I got to see it. I am obsessed with the Nollywood phenomenon, partly because I'm Nigerian, and it was so cool to see it given a great portrayal. There probably will never be a film industry like Hollywood anywhere else in the world; it ain't gonna happen. But it's nice to see that in some parts of the world, that just doesn't matter. The best films are those that speak to our culture. The best films, like the best cookies, are homemade. So eat up indie and never get full.

NOLLYWOOD BABYLON (a documentary?!)
plot: Hark, the third-world Hollywood.
thought: Indie film is cool everywhere.
in five: 4/5
A few more home movies

So is the rental addiction over? There are just so many random movies--forget the AFI-recommended, IMDB top voted, Oscar winners, etc etc.--I have weird tastes. So I'm going to find a few more flicks to increase my cultural learnings to make benefit glorious mental film libraries of letop5. You are welcome, physically or electronically, to join me.